Why No Festive Mood On This Labor Day?
by Bill Onasch
This is
probably the gloomiest Labor Day weekend in my memory. Not just because of the
lousy weather a lot us are experiencing. Nor is it mainly because gasoline
prices are the highest ever. No, a lot of working people are disturbed with the
general state of things in our society as well as feeling anxiety about the
future.
"Labor Leaders
Not Festive On This Holiday," reads one AP headline.
"Labor Day No Picnic for the Unemployed," says another.
"Labor
Day 2003: Nothing to Celebrate," is a title chosen by Mark
Weisbrot.
"U.S. Workers Struggle in Worst Job Slump Since Great Depression," is a feature
story on the AFL-CIO web site.
A Molly Ivins column begins: "This poignant Labor Day, when the numbers are bad, the policies are worse and the jobs are disappearing, it's not so much the economy that riles me as the disrespect and the gratuitous contempt with which this administration treats working Americans."
Laborers International President Terence O'Sullivan is quoted as saying "If things keep up the way they've been going, we're going to be engaged in collective begging, not bargaining. What happens in the next five years defines the next 50."
We could cite many more examples of anger and frustration within the organized labor movement. Bad as our situation is most unorganized workers are faring even worse. Millions feel the “middle class American dream” slipping away from them while others fret about their future. Of course, many in the working class—especially among Blacks, Latinos, and recent immigrants—were never included in the dream.
You would have to go back to the early 1930s to find a period matching the breadth and depth of attacks on virtually all aspects of the living standards, job security, and democratic rights of American workers. Let’s review just a few.
Preemptive War and Colonial Occupation
Jobless Recovery
Health Care
Retirement
Education
The Environment
Science
has flagged many of the environmental dangers inherent in the short sighted
greed of the global market economy. There are potential practical solutions available to
most of these problems. But in recent years there has actually been a retreat
from the earlier modest gains won by the environmental movement in air and water
pollution and forest, mining, and agricultural practices. Even the timid goals
of the Kyoto Treaty to reduce greenhouse gasses have been repudiated. Inhumane
and polluting pig and chicken factories and genetically modified crops are
overrunning the countryside—already being reduced in area by runaway urban
sprawl. Oil companies press for drilling rights in the Arctic Refuge while
nonunion coal companies literally blast the tops off mountains to scoop up coal
with minimal labor time. SUVs have reversed the progress once made in fuel
economy at the same time that transit service is being slashed in many areas.
And what is being done here in America is nothing compared to what American
corporations are doing to the environment of other lands. What a global mess is
being left behind for our kids and grandkids!
What Can We Do?
Some union leaders are saying that organizing the unorganized is the key task and propose that the lion’s share of union resources be devoted to this effort.
Of course organizing is a good thing. Significant resources should always be allocated to bringing more workers into our unions. But this cannot and should not be our sole, or even top priority.
For one thing, the economic situation, and the repressive labor laws unions abide by, guarantee that significant organizing victories are going to be few and far between—no matter how much money is spent. We are not going to even keep up with the number of union members lost to corporate layoffs and outsourcing.
But even more importantly we have to recognize that none of the challenges named above can be effectively addressed through traditional collective bargaining with individual employers.
That’s true even with health care and pensions. One reason we face such a crisis in these areas is the flawed historical approach of our unions. For decades we have agreed to make our health care and retirement benefits dependent on current employers. In every other industrial country the labor movement successfully fought to get universal health care and pensions as public services, guaranteed to all. Even those of us with the best health insurance are out of luck if we’re laid off. And we, not the boss, pay most of the rising costs of health insurance either directly, through premiums and copays, or indirectly by diverting compensation that could have otherwise gone to wages.
Dealing With Politics
Certainly we have never seen a White House quite so arrogant about pursuing an antiworker agenda.
While Bush & Co. may be more crude they have not strayed all that far from a bipartisan line of march that has given us a kicking the past thirty years or so.
The Democrat ‘Opposition’
The best you will hear about health care from Democrat leaders is a cynical "universal health care" scheme that requires everyone to obtain private health insurance. Their prescription plans take public funds to subsidize the unconscionable price gouging of drug companies.
It was a Democrat dominated congress that started pushing up the retirement age from 65 to 67. It was a Democrat president that appointed a Social Security Commission charged with chiseling us out of even more benefits and legitimizing discussion about Social Security privatization.
Have our leaders forgotten that it was Clinton and Gore who drove through NAFTA? Have their memory banks been purged of Gore’s "reinventing government" scam paving the way for the present escalation of privatization? Can they not recall that it was Jimmy Carter who launched deregulation that has devastated so many of our once unionized industries? How about Clinton’s use, and threats of use, of the Railway Labor Act against airline and railroad workers? Or "welfare reform?"
The AFL-CIO leadership, after a brief fling with opposing war, now wants to talk about only "domestic" issues. The main reason for this is that they don’t want to burn any bridges, or needlessly embarrass anyone until the Democrat presidential nominee gets sorted out.
Lieberman is a super-hawk, projecting himself as tougher than Bush. Gephardt doesn’t like to say much more than we should "support the troops." Kerry voted in the senate to support Bush's attack on Iraq and favors more troops being sent there. The recently christened "peace" candidate Dean says Bush’s war drive was wrong but now that we are there we have to use the occupation to do the right thing.
With this kind of "opposition" it’s no wonder that so many workers have become demoralized, convinced that our plight is hopeless. Fortunately there are some who don’t accept "resistance is futile," and are prepared to fight. Populist columnist and radio commentator Jim Hightower sets a good tone with his A Labor Day Call to Arms.
Inspiring struggles, such as Verizon and at the Bush family alma mater Yale, continue on the picket lines.
A National Labor Assembly For Peace is scheduled for October.
There is still plenty of pride and fight left in the American working class waiting to be tapped.
What A Real Opposition Would Say
We should renounce the doctrine of preemptive war. End the occupation in
Afghanistan and Iraq and bring our GIs home. Repeal the Patriot Act.
Enact a constitutional amendment to guarantee everyone the right to a job with
decent pay. Reduce the work week to 35 hours with no cut in pay. Pull out
of NAFTA, WTO, and all the other institutions of global capitalism.
Allow workers to choose union representation through card check. Repeal the Taft-Hartley Act with its prohibition of such effective tactics as mass picketing, secondary boycotts, sympathy strikes, and hot cargo embargos.5
This is the direction we must take in my opinion. Half measures, "incremental" progress is insufficient. Our problems are drastic and fundamental—so must be our solutions.
Are such demands impractical? Hardly. Never in the history of humanity has so much wealth been concentrated in such few hands in a single country. The wealth created by the working class is more than sufficient to meet all basic human needs. But we will have to adjust taxation and other measures to pry a little bit more out of the tight fists of the ruling rich.
Building a Working Class Party
We can expect
a fierce struggle to obtain what we need and deserve. We will get nowhere
without a party of our own.
We have a
start toward such a party—the Labor Party. The
Labor Party was launched at a 1996
convention that attracted 1400 delegates. It is comprised of both affiliated
unions—presently representing about two million members—and community chapters
open to all who agree with the party, union member or not.
The Labor Party is strong on analysis and program. It is powerful in developing internal democracy. It is fearless in standing up to our enemies.
Unfortunately, it is still relatively weak in numbers and material resources. LP is not yet in a position to seriously run candidates for office.
But there’s a lot more to politics, at least working class politics, than elections. One thing the Labor Party can do today is to start focusing public debate about real issues and real solutions. For example, the Labor Party is currently initiating two regional conferences around the health care issue.
Labor Party members are also active in solidarity actions, organizing drives—and in opposing the war and occupation in Iraq.
Labor Party national organizer, Mark Dudzic, writes in the current issue of Labor Party Press:

"What distinguishes the Labor Party is our serious approach to building real power for working people. This approach requires patience, vision, persistence, and principles. We will need to mobilize massive financial resources and millions of people. We will need to confront a system grown fat in its arrogance and sophisticated in its methods of control.
"The road ahead won’t be easy. But we’ve tried the easy roads and they’ve all led to dead ends. Sometimes the toughest path is the only way to go."
The day after Labor Day, as most other folks are returning to work, I will be taking my turn at hitting the road. Not a trip to the lake but a trip to our nation’s capital. I’ll be attending a meeting of the Labor Party Interim National Council (sort of the equivalent of a party national committee.) Along the way I will be stopping for visits with LP chapters in Chicago and Detroit.
While the mood at these gatherings may not be festive it won’t be depressed either. It will be determined, anxious to stir things up among our fellow workers. We are convinced that some day we will get a shot at contending for working class power. We have a lot of work to do to be ready for that inevitable opportunity.
Say, what are you doing these days?
08/30/2010
Bill Onasch, webmaster of
kclabor.org, is a member of the Labor Party Interim National Council, and chair of the Kansas City LP Local Organizing Committee.
1. For resources
analyzing the war from a working class perspective see the
KC Labor War Page.
2. Dennis Kucinich is an interesting
maverick with good positions on many working class issues. Of course he hasn't
the slightest chance of getting the Democrat nomination. Even if he were elected
he would get little support needed from congress. A single good guy can't
substitute for a needed mass movement. You can find more information about
Kucinich, and all the other contenders, on
congress.org.
3. See the Labor Party's
Just Health Care campaign.
4. See the Labor Party's
Higher Education campaign.
5. See the Labor Party's
Campaign for Worker Rights.